Employment Tribunal decisions, read by AI
Practical questions about Employment Tribunal claims, answered from more than 134,000 published judgments using AI that runs on a single desktop computer. This site explains how each tool works, what it finds, and where its limits are.
Above upper: more than the upper band limit for the year the claim was presented.
What the published Employment Tribunal judgments show about extending time under the 'reasonably practicable' and 'just and equitable' tests: how often late claims get in, what made the difference, and where representation made a difference.
11 min read
Every disability discrimination judgment in the published register, the impairments relied on, and what the tribunal decided about each, searchable by condition, outcome and the part of the test that failed.
4 min read
How often ADHD and autism are relied on as disabilities in Employment Tribunal claims, how often respondents concede them, and how often tribunals find they meet the statutory test.
6 min read
Why some of the tools in this series run on a single desktop computer, what that gains and loses compared with cloud AI services, and where the line ended up being drawn.
5 min read
Every injury to feelings award in the published judgments, searchable by band, protected characteristic and claim year, with a proposed figure placed among the awards tribunals have made.
3 min read
How injury to feelings awards were extracted from every published Employment Tribunal judgment, using a pattern-matching pass, a language model running locally, and checks of every figure against the text of the judgment.
10 min read
A blind-marked comparison of how general-purpose AI services and a local tool handle realistic employment law problems.
